VIDS HOW AEC AND LNP/LABOR RIGGED TOWNSVILLE SENATE VOTE –PAT COLEMAN 1/8/19
VIDS HOW AEC AND LNP/LABOR RIGGED TOWNSVILLE SENATE
VOTE –PAT COLEMAN 1/8/19
“All
parties were telling people not to read the leaflet and that it was a lie. YET
ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE AEC WEBSITE THE WHOLE ELECTION UNDER CANDIDATE
INFORMATION WAS A HANDBOOK SAYING EXACTLY WHAT I WAS SAYING. IGNORANCE OF THE
LAW IS NO EXCUSE .”
The Electoral Commission of Qld has fucked over all my links to
donations returns in my articles. They have changed all links. To make it
easier to view these broken links go to my page with the new links in a new browser
and scroll down to the relevant return in the article. Page link here: https://cynicismcentraltownsvilleaustralia.blogspot.com/2019/10/changed-ecq-donor-returns-links-page.html
With reference to the High Court challenges being brought in 2 seats against the results for misleading voters and a s44 issue , this is an example of what happened at all Townsville booths . There was a massive government ad campaign saying they MUST follow the instructions ...........which wernt quite the actual law.
The ABC story on the court challenges :
Josh
Frydenberg and Gladys Liu hit with High Court challenge over election results
By Pat
McGrath, ABC Investigations
For other film and surrounding events , and for
activist legals scroll right down on my public FACEBOOK timeline here: https://www.facebook.com/pat.coleman.90
As I was unlawfully arrested on May 15 2019 at the
pre poll at Woodman CT Townsville , the cops seized my camera because I filmed
everything that will get me off. No trial date has been set but it took court
action to get copies of films off my own camera.
Because they refuse to hand over the camera , I cant
do that simple forensic examination of my own SD card for other films and to
show where any films have been edited. A simple $40 job at a well known major
camera chain in every city.
I was railing against the crooks and fascists and
the illegal buying buying of influence by the Indian miner ADANI.See the Canavan
part 2 video below and my timeline above. The legals on how to prosecute them are on my
blog in previous posts .
The 2 months it took coincides with the end of court
challenge time for any result. The cops were backing variously ONE NATION cos many of its candidates have been drawn
from their ranks , and the LNP QLD . That because Dale Last , the former copper
in charge of the Townsville Cop Shop is now the QLD State member for the seat
of Burdekin.
Bent now , bent then, because both Tabcorp and The
CTH Bank got done for terrorism and organised crime money laundering in the Fed
Court and he joined the LNP knowing that they took proceeds of crime . As a
former SGT in charge of the station he would have given orders for his own
blokes to target drug dealers at the casino. Suck on that coppers !
Google “Tabcorp Money Laundering” and “Commonwealth Bank money laundering” . In the Tabcorp case in the federal court they
said they were responsible for the acts of their subsidiaries . So google CTH
Bank subsidiaries and type all names into the donor boxes here http://democracyforsale.net/search-aec/
and here https://disclosures.ecq.qld.gov.au/Map
Pasted below the video is the text of the leaflet I
was handing out at the pre poll explaining the legalities of formal voting and
the offences surrounding lying to the people. The AEC, Cops and all parties
were given a copy at the earliest opportunity and the public were asked to ask
the AEC what a FORMAL VOTE FOR THE SENATE WAS IN THE CONTEXT OF 1 ABOVE THE
LINE OR 6 BELOW. .
What they all did influenced the outcome because, if
they public had know they could only put a 1 above , that would thwart the
preference deals like the LNP did with the crook Clive Palmer to put each othe
2nd even though they are pursuing him in the courts and he owes the
government $70 Million..
All parties were telling people not to read the
leaflet and that it was a lie. YET ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE AEC WEBSITE THE
WHOLE ELECTION UNDER CANDIDATE INFORMATION WAS A HANDBOOK SAYING EXACTLY WHAT I
WAS SAYING. IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE .
The scrutineers handbook
Being a serving senator , Canavan should have known
he was in abuse of his office and engaging in misconduct under the CTH Crimes Act and CTH Criminal Code
ACT , just like how NSW and QLD pollies are subject to the ICAC and CCC
respectively.
325 Officers not to influence vote
(1) A person who, being an officer other than an
Antarctic officer, does any act or thing with the intention of influencing the
vote of another person, commits an offence punishable on conviction by imprisonment
for a period not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding 10 penalty units,
or both.
329 Misleading or deceptive publications etc.
(1) A person shall not, during the relevant period in relation
to an election under this Act, print, publish or distribute, or cause, permit
or authorize to be printed, published or distributed, any matter or thing that
is likely to mislead or deceive an elector in relation to the casting of a
vote.
(4) A person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence
punishable on conviction:
(a) if the offender is a natural person—by imprisonment for a
period not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding 10 penalty units, or
both; or
(b) if the offender is a body corporate—by a fine not
exceeding 50 penalty units.
(5) In a prosecution of a person for an offence against
subsection (4) by virtue of a contravention of subsection (1), it is a defence
if the person proves that he or she did not know, and could not reasonably be
expected to have known, that the matter or thing was likely to mislead an
elector in relation to the casting of a vote.
Note: A defendant bears a legal burden in relation to the
defence in subsection (5) (see section 13.4 of the Criminal Code).
(5A) Section 15.2 of the Criminal Code (extended geographical
jurisdiction—category B) applies to an offence against subsection (4).
(6) In this section, publish includes
publish by radio, television, internet or telephone.
THE
VIDEOS I PUT ON YOUTUBE
Australian Electoral Commission Influenced 2019 Senate Vote
Australian Senator Canavan Misleading voters
Townsville 2019 Pt1
Australian Senator Canavan Misleading voters
Townsville 15/5/19 pt2 https://youtu.be/8js_fNDD8qw
LNP Fool
misleading voters in Townsville 2019 Townsville Australia https://youtu.be/gt0iGK1w1rY
Prior to arresting me on orders from the LNP cop bosses on the 15th
, there were 3 attempts by One Nation and the Labor party , and of all people a
greens volunteer who had heard we fell out over compulsory preferential voting,
and decided I was fair game (go figure)- to have me arrested This is the
result of one of them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3a4z9rn_Nw&feature=youtu.be
THE TEXT OF THE LEAFLETS SHOWING THE ACTUAL LAW
WWW.CYNICISMCENTRALTOWNSVILLEAUSTRALIA.BLOGSPOT.COM
Look at what
was said by Anthony Albanese in 2013 for instance “That’s
why compulsory preferential (voting) is such a winner .It just stops these
pricks from grand-standing the way they love to do by just saying ‘vote one’ .
They have to make a choice, which is something they hate to do” (The Australian
23-4 -2013 p 18)
s329 Of The CTH Electoral
Act: Misleading or deceptive publications etc.
(1) A person shall not, during
the relevant period in relation to an election under this Act, print, publish
or distribute, or cause, permit or authorize to be printed, published or
distributed, any matter or thing that is likely to mislead or deceive an
elector in relation to the casting of a vote.” https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00103/Download
The voting system for
the House of Representatives (Green ballot) is unconstitutional
and this is set out on my blog above. Everyone has internet on their phone with
which to check everything I tell you. And you have till May 18 6pm to vote or
not. Anyone can take my High Court Election Injunction argument on my blog
above to a lawyer and go to court if you have the means. You have my blessing if you are a lefty.
FOR THE SENATE BALLOT
PAPER: Despite what the AEC tells you, you only have to put
1 above the line or 6 below for it to be formal. Its you who directs prefs if you chose to. Ask them what a
formal vote is and record it on your phone. If they lie to you its an offence
under s325. Cases are linked on my blog argument above. FOR THE SENATE – TO BE A FORMAL VOTE ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS 1 ABOVE
THE LINE OR 6 BELOW IF YOU WISH ACCORDING TO THE LAW.
The
relevant provisions of the CTH Electoral Act state : https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00103/Download
268A Formal votes below the
line
(1)
A
ballot paper in a Senate election is not informal under paragraph 268(1)(b) if:
(b)
if there are more than 6 squares printed on the ballot paper below the line—the
voter has consecutively numbered any of those squares from 1 to 6 (whether or
not the voter has also included one or more higher numbers in those squares).
269 Formal votes above
the line
(1) A ballot paper in a Senate election is not
informal under paragraph 268(1)(b) if:
(a)
the voter has marked the ballot paper in accordance with subsection 239(2); or
(b) the voter has marked the number 1, or the number 1
and one or more higher numbers, in squares printed on the ballot paper above
the line.
This was upheld as formal by the High Court BEFORE
the last election in pars [33] and [34] of this full bench decision against the
then god botherer Senator Day , in Day v Australian Electoral Officer for
the State of South Australia; Madden v Australian Electoral Officer for the
State of Tasmania [2016] HCA 20 http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2016/20.html
Why did I vote informal for the House of Reps ?: Compulsory preferential voting forces us
to play “who is the better nazi and mafia crook” or our votes are informal. IM
NOT PLAYING !
Because I have been a long time advocate of optional
preferential voting for the house of reps, and because we used to have it for
Qld state elections, if I could only just vote 1- I would. My prefs don’t then
fall into the wrong hands. But because we have compulsory preferential (which
is unconstitutional) you have to fill out all boxes on the green ballot paper.
This conscripts us into the LNP or ALP cos we can’t stop them getting our vote
against our will. So how, in this very tight electorate of Herbert do I vote and still stop my
prefs falling into fascist and corrupt hands??
I cast an informal vote.
The only difference is that my candidate- if I have one doesn’t get the public
money per vote after the election
In item 6 , in the section of my constitutional
argument (My Blog above) entitled “The Proportionality argument” against CPV I
said “By virtue of s 200DJ(1) and (3) , s200DK and s206 of The Electoral Act ,
an elector is marked off as receiving the ballot once identified and goes to
cast that ballot in private and in the secrecy of the booth. That vote is
recorded as having been cast and no other elector can use it .
No commission staff may disclose information
identifying an electors vote or about how the person voted. No prosecution if
any could be instigated for informal voting. The practical effect of this is
that is not illegal to cast an informal ballot into the box to deny it “falling
into the wrong hands’ through being forced to mark ballots against the electors
wishes .It complies with s245(1)
where it states “(1) It shall be the duty of every elector to vote at each
election” . The elector has voted. But for the terms of the compulsory preferential
provisions, an elector could lawfully be taken to have “voted against”
all candidates. This is supposed to be protected by s327(1).
The Federal 2016 results for Herbert (Based on
Townsville) came down to 37 votes and house majority was 1 https://results.aec.gov.au/20499/Website/HouseDivisionPage-20499-165.htm The 1995
Qld State seat Mundingburra
(Based on Suburbs of Townsville) results were that 635 people exhausted their
preferences . Then after the remainder were distributed there was a 16 vote
difference between the parties under the then Optional Preferential system. The
state election turned on 16 votes . (see my blog for Supreme Court case links
that changed the gov)
Without a doubt, its literacy, technology and access
to information that is causing the old order to shake just as it with the
reformation and the printing press.
These 2 elections alone invoke what was hinted at in Langer above [1996] HCA 43; (1996) 186 CLR 302 at p 333
per Toohey and Gaudron JJ at par [17] .
Comments
Post a Comment